2025 Was a Year of Pain Atiku Blasts Tinubu’s Leadership Over Economy and Insecurity
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has provided a harsh assessment of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's administration, characterizing 2025 as "a year of pain" for Nigerians, defined by rising economic hardship and increased insecurity. In a scathing statement, Atiku accused the federal administration of policy failure, poor coordination, and a failure to protect individuals from the unpleasant repercussions of its changes.
Economic hardship at the centre of the critique.
Atiku's critique focuses on the economy, claiming that inflation, currency volatility, and the high cost of living have reduced household incomes and decimated small enterprises. He cited rising food prices, transportation costs, and energy charges as proof that many Nigerians would fall into poverty by 2025.
While recognizing that reforms may be necessary, Atiku contended that the timing, sequencing, and social buffers were insufficient, leaving ordinary Nigerians to bear the brunt of the burden. He condemned the administration's approach as "policy bankruptcy," claiming that measures were implemented without adequate safeguards, consultation, or clear explanation.
Insecurity is a growing national concern.
Beyond the economy, Atiku expressed concern about continued insecurity across many locations. From banditry and kidnappings in the North-West and North-Central to insurgency threats in the North-East and violent crimes elsewhere, he claimed locals were terrified for much of the year.
According to Atiku, the government's response lacked coordination and urgency, leaving security services overburdened and people feeling abandoned. He advocated for a complete security reform, improved information cooperation, and increased investment in community policing and development-driven solutions.
Governance and Accountability Issues
Atiku also questioned the administration's governance style, claiming that internal policy conflicts and sluggish implementation harmed confidence at home and abroad. He urged the government to embrace transparency, accountability, and participatory decision-making, warning that public trust is eroding as officials appear removed from citizens' circumstances.
He highlighted that criticism should not be disregarded as politics, claiming that Nigerians' lived experiences—job losses, hunger, and insecurity—speak louder than official data.
Government Position and the Ongoing Debate
Supporters of the Tinubu administration argue that 2025 was a transition year, with severe but essential changes aimed at stabilizing the economy and setting Nigeria for long-term success. They contend that some suffering was unavoidable after years of structural abnormalities, and that benefits will accrue over time.
Atiku, on the other hand, said that outcomes, not intentions, define leadership. He urged the government to immediately adjust its policies, boost social protection programs, stabilize prices, and restore security.
Looking ahead.
As Nigeria moves forward, Atiku's statements have sparked national debate over the balance of reform and welfare, as well as whether the government has struck the appropriate note. With public discontent still high, authorities are under pressure to provide visible relief, restore trust, and ensure that future reforms are people-centric and security-conscious.
Whether Atiku's critique is interpreted as opposition politics or a necessary wake-up call, his message resonates with millions who saw 2025 as a difficult year and now expect better governance, security, and economic stability.
0 Comments