Religious Extremism and Human Rights: Why No Nigerian Should Suffer for Their Belief
Nigeria is characterized by diversity in culture, race, language, and religion. Christianity, Islam, and traditional traditions have coexisted for centuries, influencing towns and identities across the country. However, in recent decades, religious extremism has strained this variety, posing a threat not just to national unity but also to millions of Nigerians' fundamental human rights. No Nigerian—Muslim, Christian, or devotee of any other faith—should suffer, be attacked, displaced, or killed because of their beliefs.
Understanding Religious Extremism.
Religious extremism arises when individuals or groups adopt rigid, intolerant interpretations of faith and try to enforce them through violence, compulsion, or exclusion. Extremists frequently claim divine justification for their conduct, but in reality, they violate religion's essential values of peace, compassion, justice, and respect for human dignity.
In Nigeria, extremist violence has manifested itself in various ways, including insurgency, banditry disguised as religious rhetoric, mob attacks, forced conversions, worship centre destruction, and targeted killings. These actions are not expressions of faith; rather, they are abuses of religion for power, control, and terror.
Human rights are not conditional.
Human rights are universal and inalienable. These are not privileges bestowed by the majority, the government, or religious leaders. The Nigerian Constitution protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, including the right to alter one's beliefs and practice them publicly and peacefully. These rights apply equally to all Nigerians, regardless of geography or religion.
When someone is attacked, discriminated against, or denied opportunities because of their beliefs, it is a breach of both morality and the constitution. No religious doctrine justifies denying another person's humanity.
The Cost of Extremism to Ordinary Nigerians
Religious fundamentalism has caused deep wounds in Nigerian society. Entire villages have been relocated. Children have lost access to schooling. Farmers have abandoned their land. Places of worship have been demolished. Families have been ripped apart by violence that claims religious justification but simply causes sorrow.
Perhaps most harmful is the climate of fear and mistrust created by extremists. Neighbours start to see each other as foes. Communities segregate into religious and ethnic groups. This deterioration of societal cohesion undermines Nigeria considerably more than any foreign danger could.
Faith Is Not The Enemy.
It is vital to differentiate between religion and radicalism. The vast majority of Nigerian Muslims and Christians oppose violence and live together peacefully. Mosques and churches both promote love, tolerance, and respect. Extremists constitute a small minority, but their acts have far-reaching consequences.
Blaming entire faith communities for extremists' acts is unjust and ineffective. Collective blame fosters anger, reinforces stereotypes, and drives society more apart—exactly the consequence that radicals aim.
Political failure and the exploitation of religion
Religious extremism does not develop in a vacuum. It thrives in areas with weak government, extensive poverty, selective justice, and political leaders that fail to protect all citizens equitably. In certain circumstances, politicians use religious sentiment to attract support or divert attention away from ineffective leadership. In others, silence or inactivity encourages extremists.
When the state fails to prosecute criminals or appears to bargain with violent actors without accountability, it sends a terrible message: violence is effective. This weakens the rule of law and erodes public trust in the state's ability to protect all individuals equally.
Youth and the Danger of Radicalization
Young people are more vulnerable to extremist recruitment, particularly in situations characterized by unemployment, a lack of education, and social marginalization. Extremist groups take advantage of people's desperation and despair by making false promises of purpose, affiliation, and supernatural rewards.
Military power alone is unable to protect young Nigerians from radicalism. It calls for education, economic opportunity, civic inclusion, and strong moral leadership from families, religious organizations, and the government.
Why Should No Nigerian Suffer for Their Belief?
The issue boils down to one fundamental truth: belief is personal. It is an issue of conscience, not force. Christians should not be afraid to worship in the North. Muslims should not be afraid to live in the South. Traditional worshippers should not be ignored or insulted. A society that penalizes belief has lost its moral compass.
History has demonstrated that countries that fail to defend religious freedom inevitably fall into cycles of violence and repression. Nigeria cannot afford this course. Fear cannot serve as the foundation for unity; instead, mutual respect is required.
The Role of Religious Leaders
Religious leaders wield great power. When they talk properly, they can reduce tensions and foster peace. When they remain silent in the face of injustice—or worse, incite passions—they contribute to harm.
True religious leadership entails explicitly opposing violence, safeguarding the defenseless, and instilling in followers that faith does not justify brutality. Silence in the face of extremism is not neutral; it is collaboration.
What Must be Done
Ending religious extremism and preserving human rights in Nigeria necessitates a comprehensive strategy:
Equal Protection Under the Law: The state must protect all citizens equally and prosecute violators regardless of religion or status.
Victims of religious violence deserve to know the truth, face consequences, and receive reparation.
Tolerance education requires schools to instil civic principles, critical thinking skills, and respect for variety.
Responsible leadership requires political and religious leaders to condemn hate speech and discord.
Community Dialogue: Interfaith involvement at the grassroots level can develop trust and avert violence.
The Case of the Kaduna PhD Holder: A Tragic Warning
Conclusion
Religious extremism is more than just a security issue; it is a human rights disaster. It dehumanizes victims, distorts faith, and jeopardizes the fundamental fabric of Nigeria's plural society. No Nigerian should have to suffer for their beliefs. Protecting religious freedom benefits everyone, not just minorities.
Nigeria's strength is in its diversity. Maintaining that strength necessitates courage: the courage to combat extremism, protect justice, and proclaim the dignity of all people. Only then can Nigeria advance toward a future in which faith brings peace rather than pain.
0 Comments